News

The debate on whether the death penalty deters and lowers rates of crime is a long-simmering one, with both sides variously claiming evidence in their favor.
Deterrence Capital punishment is often justified with the argument that by executing convicted murderers, we will deter would-be murderers from killing people. The arguments against deterrence ...
Capital punishment must come to an end. It does not deter crime, is not humane and has no moral or medical basis ...
According to the research—which closely examined the Australian legal system and its history with capital punishment—the death penalty had a deterrent effect on homicides, resulting in an ...
The change reflects growing recognition within the Vietnamese legislative system that capital punishment is not a proportionate or effective deterrent for certain crimes.
A Utilitarian Age Looks Hard at the Deterrent ValueIN England around 1800, more than 200 offenses, including forgery, poaching, cutting down somebody else's tree and associating with gypsies, ...
Capital punishment has long been used in the U.S. as “the ultimate deterrent and only proper punishment for the vilest crimes. Our Founders knew well that only capital punishment can bring ...
The order utilizes falsehoods about the deterrent character of capital punishment, as well as about its constitutionality, to outline a fascistic escalation of the already barbaric practice that ...
Thirty-two states allow capital punishment for the most heinous crimes. And yet in most of the country, the penalty is now hollow.
Capital punishment is not retribution enough Some people who believe in the notion of retribution are against capital punishment because they feel the death penalty provides insufficient retribution.
Capital punishment has long been used in the U.S. as “the ultimate deterrent and only proper punishment for the vilest crimes.