The Marshall Project reports on Supreme Court rulings that weakened universal injunctions, impacting immigration laws while some criminal justice cases favored litigants.

Two of the fired federal immigration judges disclosed that they were told how they should rule on immigration cases.

Earlier this month, the Trump Administration ended bond hearings for undocumented people in detention and fired 20 ...

Help desks at immigration courts disappear along with other basic legal services as Trump administration ramps up deportation ...

A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday against a New Jersey law that banned private companies from contracting with the ...

Immigration cases that have been dormant for years are being added to dockets again. Houston attorneys say it's part of Trump ...

Thousands of legal cases reach U.S. courts every year. From accusations of mistreatment in prisons to fraud to sexual abuse ...

Hiding ICE attorneys’ names in immigration court proceedings violates a fundamental principle that has protected Americans ...

Ventura County District Attorney Erik Nasarenko and Ventura County Public Defender Claudia Y. Bautista write about legal ...

As Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong’s ruling rippled across the region, the federal government requested an immediate stay, ...

After Supreme Court rejects Florida's appeal for its immigration law, City Council member says court rulings back up what critics said about city law.

A U.S. appeals court has struck down a New Jersey law that bans operators from contracting with the federal government to run immigration detention centers in the state.