The murder conviction of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin needs to be reexamined on the basis of facts alone.

In courts, a person isn't convicted without solid evidence proving their ... the defendant's guilt must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt." So, when you offer someone the benefit of the doubt ...

circumstantial evidence and reasonable doubt. Judge Shaw defined murder as killing with "malice aforethought," whether expressed or implied, and manslaughter as killing without malice, as "through ...

Collection of crime-scene materials had been done without what would now be considered ... cannot satisfy me either beyond a reasonable doubt or to any other acceptable standard.” ...