New USPTO rules confirm that AI can support the invention process, but only humans can legally claim inventorship under U.S.
For a business planning to market a product that incorporates an invention, having an enforceable patent to protect the invention is often desirable. Two recent federal circuit cases reiterate what ...
Garson Law on MSNOpinion
Can a state prevent enforcement of a U.S. patent?
The short answer is – we’re about to find out. An inventor’s patent rights are based on the U.S. Constitution: “Congress ...
While tort and liability issues are at the forefront of people's minds, questions also will need to be answered as to how AI impacts intellectual property rights. Artificial intelligence and machine ...
USPTO issues new guidelines on patenting AI-assisted inventions, reaffirming that only humans can be legal inventors.
Introduction - Far too often, startup founders treat intellectual property (IP)—especially patents—like an item on a to-do list.
The USPTO and the U.S. Department of Justice filed a joint public interest comment with the International Trade Commission on ...
The “right to useful inventions … belong[s] to the inventors.” James Madison articulated this core principle in the Federalist Papers and embedded it into our Constitution more than two centuries ago.
The Federal Circuit wiped out biotech company Seagen Inc.'s $41.8 million verdict against AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results