I have always assumed that judges, particularly SCOTUS judges, would know better than to deny facts, but I guess I was wrong.
It’s obvious that the Court isn’t actually trying to come up with a legal rule that makes sense.
Straight Arrow News (English) on MSN
A ‘refocus' or First Amendment threat? Pentagon takes over Stars and Stripes
Stars and Stripes says its First Amendment rights are being threatened after the Pentagon said it would take over editorial ...
Lawmakers are calling on President Trump's cabinet and Congress to boot him from office using a never-before-invoked ...
Several Democratic lawmakers are urging President Donald Trump's cabinet to invoke a never-used constitutional provision to ...
The video is the latest example of federal immigration authorities labeling anyone who opposes them a "domestic terrorist." ...
NPR's Michel Martin asks First Amendment lawyer Theodore Boutrous about the FBI executing a search warrant at the home of a Washington Post reporter.
The state requires carry permit holders to obtain advance permission before bringing firearms onto private property open to ...
The Supreme Court’s review of United States v. Chatrie puts geofence warrants and mass digital data seizures under Fourth Amendment scrutiny, raising urgent questions about particularity, AI-driven ...
Events like this, where eyewitness video and independent reporting contradict the government’s account, highlight the importance of press freedom.
Even if the governor’s proposal becomes law, there’s a good chance it’ll be blocked in federal court, just as similar laws ...
10don MSN
Press freedom advocates worry that raid on Washington Post journalist's home will chill reporting
Press freedom advocates are concerned this week's raid on a Washington Post journalist's home will deter reporting on ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results