The Supreme Court refused to allow 19 Republican-leaning states to side with oil companies in a massive climate-change lawsuit.
4d
MyNewsLA.com on MSNCalifornia Supreme Court Refuses Review of 1978 Slaying CaseThe California Supreme Court refused Wednesday to review the case of a man convicted of fatally stabbing a man 45 times in an ...
The California State Bar leaders who oversaw the February Bar Exam that glitched and crashed widely must now decide how to ...
The Supreme Court agreed Monday in a case ... It takes four justices to grant review. The nine-member court does not typically reveal how justices vote at this stage of a case so it’s unclear ...
4d
KFI AM 640 on MSNCalifornia Supreme Court Won't Hear Case of 1978 SlayingThe California Supreme Court refused Wednesday to review the case of a man convicted of fatally stabbing a man 45 times in an ...
With at least four votes now securing a review, the case will be ... Her lawyers cite a 2018 Supreme Court decision that ruled California could not require anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers ...
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request by 19 Republican attorneys general to hear lawsuits filed by five Democratic states that seek to punish the oil industry for climate change.
The Eleventh Circuit leaned on the 2018 Supreme Court ruling in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra that struck down a California law requiring pro-life pregnancy ...
"Accordingly, the court today leaves the 19 plaintiff States without any legal means of vindicating their claims against the five defendant states." States seeking the Supreme Court review are ...
A majority on the Second Circuit appellate panel affirmed a 2021 decision by U.S. Judge Christina Reiss who found Vermont’s policy violates the First Amendment right of access. The majority also ...
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a free-speech challenge to laws in Colorado, California and 20 other ...
On appeal, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that the review was not necessary. In their petition to the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs argued that the law clearly indicates that veterans ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results