There are good reasons to anticipate evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, change to NATO and European defense.

Cyber defenders should recognize that internal fractures within cybercrime groups can be just as disruptive as external pressure.

Arguing that Taiwan and, by extension, the First Island Chain is lost due to robust Chinese A2/AD capabilities ...

Unfortunately, Taiwan is not prepared for Beijing’s gray-zone actions—and neither is its main supporter, the United States.

With heightened tensions between Europe and the United States over NATO and Ukraine, the myth of an F-35 "kill switch", which ...

Two B-52s escorted by Gripens conducted a flyover of the Swedish Parliament for the first anniversary of Sweden’s accession to NATO, and later performed a ...

The Trump administration has formally asked Pentagon officials for “credible military options” to ensure unfettered American ...

U.S. Air Forces in Europe integrated with air forces from Romania, Croatia, and Bulgaria for ONYX CROSS, a Bomber Task Force 25-2 mission over Eastern and Southern Europe on March 3. A U.S. Air Force ...

As the Prime Minister considers sending UK troops to Ukraine, assessing his options with the Chilcot checklist suggests the ...

Ukraine would thus be forced to brace itself for war without U.S. support. In any case, a withdrawal of that support might in the long run be the outcome of either path presented to Zelensky at the ...

Australia’s cyber capabilities have evolved rapidly, but they are still largely reactive, not preventative. Rather than ...

The maximalist US approach to deterring China's digital competition may not be served well by economic measures alone.