The role of the judiciary is to interpret laws and rule on matters of constitutionality—not to govern. When courts attempt to ...

I think that there are some somewhat inconsistent comments in the Sixth Circuit decision that I see as tiptoeing around an ...

Nationwide injunctions both cross that line and prevent the federal government from enforcing an act of Congress, executive order, or agency rule against nonparties. Unless and until Congress endorses ...

“ The Invention of Immigration Exceptionalism ,” published in November by Adam Cox in the Yale Law Journal, runs 117 pages.

In January 2024, a group of writers filed a lawsuit in California against Meta for using their works to train various ...

The electoral bonds saga, once deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, has found its way back into India’s legal ...

Hon. Farah Dagogo was a former governorship aspirant in the 2023 Rivers State election. He was at different times a member of ...

After months of white-knuckled anticipation, we can at last unclench, exhale, and let the zephyr of normalcy wash over us.

Citing a recent federal Supreme Court ruling, a state House committee passed a bill saying courts should not automatically defer to administrative agencies when interpreting ambiguities in the law.

Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa’s judicial conduct has long been questioned for his apparent soft corner for the Sharifs. But if his perceived leniency towards them was concerning, his open hostility ...