People often arrive at juvenile court with their guard up. Danielle Moore and Denise Gonzalez-Avila can understand why. As ...

Judges this week ordered the government to reinstate thousands of workers, while the administration turned to the Supreme ...

A Dublin District Court judge has described Tusla's duty and obligation towards children in its care as "shocking and ...

Although it is not a precedential decision, the Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Orozco v. Aragon helps shed some light on how to apply the rules of civil procedure in a custody relocation matter.

If the public knows anything from watching television’s assortment of courtroom shows, it’s that no one yields more power in ...

Across all industries, private companies, family offices, and their owners and management teams face rapidly evolving challenges, opportunities, ...

Put aside for a moment the fact that Common Pleas Senior Judges Jacqueline Carrol Cody and Katherine B.L. Platt both wear black robes while at work. They share other things in common, too.

A federal appeals court has revived legal action in the Kendrick Johnson case, allowing his parents to sue individual officials for his 2013 gym mat death.

COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) - South Carolina’s family courts are “in crisis,” and ... time money to modernize the judiciary’s online case management system. He said the early-2000s system is ...

COLUMBIA, S.C. (WCSC) - South Carolina’s family courts are “in crisis,” and the state ... also asking for $45 million in one-time money to modernize the judiciary’s online case management system. He ...

However understanding the real impact of trauma on the brain and how that affects parties in the family court is still in its infancy. The need for a trauma-informed approach to representation in ...

"Surprises in a will reading rarely enhance family harmony." Photo / 123rf Late last year, the Supreme Court confirmed the ... the claim at the heart of the case represented an exception in ...