Before generative AI, if you wanted an inexpensive way to build out ... No, what triggered the reversal wasn’t faulty output—but an outright revolt from within. Wikipedia’s editorial process runs on a ...

The revolt against the machines What’s fascinating about this particular stumble is that the AI didn’t actually get anything egregiously wrong.

Before generative AI, if you wanted an inexpensive way to build out lots of content, you launched a wiki. You’d spin up a site—broad or niche—and throw the doors open for anyone to edit. Be ...

Free of ads and profit-seeking corporate overlords, and maintained by dedicated volunteers, Wikipedia has consistently ranked ...

The latest Grok controversy is revealing not for the extremist outputs, but for how it exposes a fundamental dishonesty in AI development.

It doesn’t really matter who you are, how you spend your time online, or what you imagine your relationship with the internet ...

AI bots rely heavily on Wikipedia, which feed them a diet of half-truths, ideological bias and leftist lies — and then pass along the propaganda to millions of ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

MrBeast is shuttering an AI tool after creator backlash, highlighting the tightrope walk that companies must navigate when adding AI video features.